In the last post, you learned about how doing an active “entrepreneurship-ish” deal inside your Solo 401(k) is an open invitation for the IRS to tax the hell out of you.

In this post, you’ll learn the solution.

• The solution is not to avoid doing active deals.
• The solution is not to stop pursuing massive profits or to lock away your talents and skill to be unused.

The solution is to structure both your active entrepreneurship and your passive investment activity in a way that that puts you in the most control. Put another way, avoid giving the IRS an open invitation to tax attack you.

I bet you can guess where this is going (one commenter had a pretty good idea on Part 1 of the post)…

Active Deal Structure

Run your active entrepreneurship activity (a.k.a. “business activity”) in your… (wait for it)… business! Your business can be a Sole Proprietorship or it can be more formally structured as an LLC or Corporation.

If your entrepreneurship needs a financial kickstart, borrow up to $50,000 (or $100,000 between you and your spouse) in the form of a “participant loan” from your pre-existing retirement funds. Do your business activity, generate massive profits, and contribute up to $54,500 (or $109,000 between you and your spouse) tax-deductibly each and every year. That adds up quickly.

Passive Deal Structure

Run your passive investments through your Self-Directed Solo 401k (a.k.a. your investment account).

My God, that sounds too simple to be effective, you may think. Hey now, don’t fall into the “scheming pit.”

Over 95% of the Self-Directed Solo 401(k) conversations I see online are all about some sneaky structure to reign triumphant over the IRS, like a clever fox. Sounds like a good bubble to burst, so I don’t mind if I do…

The IRS doesn’t like being tricked. They can even be mean from time to time. I can’t help but to wonder how much profit would have been made if the millions of hours of sneaky scheming were to be replaced with taking action on making good investments with a non-risky tax approach.

Side Benefits

There are side benefits to this sound approach too.

Many Self-Directed Solo 401(k) investors are doing active real estate deals inside their retirement plan. That introduces further limitations, especially with debt financing, such as:

• Lower LTV (loan-to-value ratio) loan limits
• Less lenders and loans available in the marketplace
• Higher down payment (more cash investment required, which lowers cash-on-cash return)

Don’t get me wrong. Many healthy, profitable real estate deals are done inside retirement plans and with debt financing.

But, not all real estate deals should be done either inside or outside of a retirement plan. It depends on the circumstances.

If it’s truly a passive investment, go for it inside your plan. If it’s truly an active deal, go for it outside of your plan. If you want to pay cash or make a large down payment, that sounds fitting for inside your plan. If you want to invest as little cash as possible, that sounds fitting for outside your plan.

So, I hope this helps you get your mental strategery in order.

Like many lessons in life, the real progress is made in unlearning myths, deceptions, and bad information. I mean, it isn’t exactly earth shattering to stand up and say “Business activity goes in a business, and investment activity goes in an investment plan,” is it? Yet, after thousands of hours in the Self-Directed Solo 401(k) industry, it may make a big impact.

——

Odds & Ends:

Don’t miss out on my year-end Solo 401k special promotion. Get on my email list to be notified when it kicks off.

]]> http://www.solo401k.com/2010/11/18/the-most-elusive-dangerous-self-directed-solo-401k-practice-part-2/feed/ 8 http://www.solo401k.com/2010/11/16/the-most-elusive-dangerous-self-directed-solo-401k-practice/ http://www.solo401k.com/2010/11/16/the-most-elusive-dangerous-self-directed-solo-401k-practice/#comments Tue, 16 Nov 2010 21:09:10 +0000 Jeff Nabers http://www.solo401k.com/?p=323 [Originally published at JeffNabers.com.]

There’s something that most “successful” Self-Directed Solo 401(k) investors do that can spin them out of control and get them into trouble.

I say “successful” in quotation marks because I’m talking about the particular kind of Self-Directed Solo 401(k) success that is sexy enough to be frequently written about.

What is this dirty deed that leads to massive profits and the potential implosion the very same Self-Directed Solo 401(k) that got those profits?

Entrepreneurship.

Bad Entrepreneur!

Yep. Entrepreneurship is so powerful that it seems to be the source of all aggressive wealth creation. So where’s the danger?

Let me explain. Some of the most [initially] profitable Self-Directed Solo 401(k) stories sounds something like this…

Joe, a Self-Directed Solo 401(k) investor, knows how to work real estate deals into profits. So he buys and sells real estate in his Self-Directed Solo 401(k). Sometimes he involves bank financing. Sometimes he involves private financing and partnering.

But one thing is for sure: Once Joe purchases a property, the work has just begun. He has a system. He only buys properties that meet a certain criteria. After the closing, he usually has repairs and/or remodeling work done.

And his system works. He’ll put $30k or $40k of his Self-Directed Solo 401(k) money into a deal and get $80k to $100k out, often less than a year or two later.

First, applaud Joe for being a successful entrepreneur.

Did you catch that? Joe is being an entrepreneur rather than an investor. This is because his deals have his active involvement rather than the passive placement of his money.

The Pinless Grenade

Unbeknownst to Joe, he’s no longer in control of his financial outcome. His choice to try to sneak business activity inside his Solo 401(k) gives the IRS an open invitation to tax the hell out of him.

How much?

Well, the IRS can declare Joe’s Solo 401(k) deals to be a “trade or business” in which they’ll apply the UBTI tax. Also known as the most aggressive tax schedule in the United States. It ramps up to 35% federal tax after only $10,000 of profit.

Will the IRS make this move? When?

That’s unknown, and Joe is no longer in control of his financial outcome.

Terrible Success

All kinds of strategies fit into this same category. I have a friend who has done over 100 deals inside his Self-Directed Solo 401(k), producing a return-on-investment of over 9,000%.

And he’s hiding under a rock. He won’t returns the calls of the newspaper and magazine reporters who want him to share his strategies with the world. He rarely teaches investing seminars, and when he does he only invites people who he has personally met and known for at least 6 months. He essentially lives a life of fear because he knows the day his Self-Directed Solo 401(k) gets audited may be the day he gives up at least $1,200,000 plus late penalties and interest to the IRS.

Enjoyable, Controlled Success

Do you know how to do deals that turn pennies into thousands? Thousands into millions?

Fantastic.

Don’t ever consider not pursuing massive profits, and don’t ever lock away your talents and skills to be unused.

Just take a few minutes to educate yourself about the best way to structure your deals to keep you in control.

More info coming in Part Two of this post soon  :-)

For the self employed, a fantastic development has occurred over the past few years – the Solo 401(k). One distinct advantage of the Solo 401(k) over an IRA is that it is not subject to paying UBIT on profits from financed real estate. Eliminating UBIT by using a Solo 401(k) eliminates the need to file a return (Form 990-T) as well as the accompanying tax. Sound pretty good so far?

The difficulty in recent times has been obtaining nonrecourse financing. The leader of NR financing in the Self Directed IRA industry for the past few years has been North American Savings Bank. Last year, they took the familiarity of IRA lending and applied it to Solo 401(k). Unfortunately for many Solo(k) investors, this has only been available to plans who choose to name a custodian as trustee of the plan. Qualified plans (which is what all 401k plans are) are different than IRAs in that they are not required by law to name a custodian (bank or trust company) as trustee of the plan assets. Investors who establish Self Directed Solo 401(k) plans that name themselves as trustee for simplicity have not been able to readily obtain mortgage loans for their Solo (k) plan from NASB.

Well, as of this month, NASB has expanded their loan products to include a nonrecourse loan program for self trusteed Solo 401(k) plans. I caught up with Matt Allen to discuss the great news on UNLIMITED RETIREMENT ACCOUNT® Radio. The skinny is that the program is almost identical to the IRA lending program. If you aren’t familiar with their guidelines, check out the URA Radio show podcast as it become available soon.

Subscribe :: del.icio.us :: Digg this :: Stumble it :: facebook

:: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: [What are these icons for?]

If you talk to the average CPA, he’ll tell you that UBIT is the boogeyman and is to be avoided… always. Discussing this topic with an above average CPA (such as Eric Wikstrom of Integrated Wealth Strategies) yields different advice.

The Two Types of UBIT

1. Triggered from a trade or business – if a tax exempt entity (such as an IRA or 401k) owns a trade or business, the income of that business is taxed at trust rates (i.e. very high tax rates). Both IRA & Solo 401k accounts are subject to this type of UBIT.
2. Triggered from ownership of leveraged real estate – if a tax exempt entity (including IRA) owns real estate leveraged with a mortgage loan, the portion of that income attributable to the mortgage loan is taxed at trust rates. This type of UBIT is specifically referred to as UDFI – Unrelated Debt Financed Income. Solo 401k accounts & other qualified plans are exempt from UDFI.

Trust tax rates are very high, so it might make sense to avoid Type 1 UBIT at all costs. On the other hand, a close examination of UDFI tends to revoke its “boogeyman” status.

The reason UDFI isn’t a detrimental cost is that non-recourse mortgage loans (the only type an IRA/401k can legally obtain) are typically only offered at a 65% loan-to-value maximum. So this means that the UDFI tax is only payable on up to 65% of the property’s net income. (That’s right – net income. You do get to deduct depreciation and other expenses before paying UDFI tax).

Let’s examine a simple comparison of the taxes payable on net real estate income with 50% leverage:

Example A

Example B

The gap between the dollar amount of taxes paid widens as the income increases:

Let’s go back and look at Example B. Take the difference in taxes and examine the long term effects of 25 years of investing and compounding returns. These charts assume a 15% annualized ROI:

Example B1

This uses an effective tax rate of 16.23% for UDFI

Example B2

This uses an individual tax rate of 28%

The result? The IRA has a balance of $631,385.87 more than the individual does.

Conclusion

It might make sense to avoid Type 1 UBIT, while Type 2 UBIT (UDFI tax) results in less taxation than the alternative of investing with individual funds. For those eligible for the Solo 401k, Type 2 UBIT (UDFI tax) generally does not apply.

Subscribe :: del.icio.us :: Digg this :: Stumble it :: facebook

:: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: [What are these icons for?]