In the last post, you learned about how doing an active “entrepreneurship-ish” deal inside your Solo 401(k) is an open invitation for the IRS to tax the hell out of you.

In this post, you’ll learn the solution.

• The solution is not to avoid doing active deals.
• The solution is not to stop pursuing massive profits or to lock away your talents and skill to be unused.

The solution is to structure both your active entrepreneurship and your passive investment activity in a way that that puts you in the most control. Put another way, avoid giving the IRS an open invitation to tax attack you.

I bet you can guess where this is going (one commenter had a pretty good idea on Part 1 of the post)…

Active Deal Structure

Run your active entrepreneurship activity (a.k.a. “business activity”) in your… (wait for it)… business! Your business can be a Sole Proprietorship or it can be more formally structured as an LLC or Corporation.

If your entrepreneurship needs a financial kickstart, borrow up to $50,000 (or $100,000 between you and your spouse) in the form of a “participant loan” from your pre-existing retirement funds. Do your business activity, generate massive profits, and contribute up to $54,500 (or $109,000 between you and your spouse) tax-deductibly each and every year. That adds up quickly.

Passive Deal Structure

Run your passive investments through your Self-Directed Solo 401k (a.k.a. your investment account).

My God, that sounds too simple to be effective, you may think. Hey now, don’t fall into the “scheming pit.”

Over 95% of the Self-Directed Solo 401(k) conversations I see online are all about some sneaky structure to reign triumphant over the IRS, like a clever fox. Sounds like a good bubble to burst, so I don’t mind if I do…

The IRS doesn’t like being tricked. They can even be mean from time to time. I can’t help but to wonder how much profit would have been made if the millions of hours of sneaky scheming were to be replaced with taking action on making good investments with a non-risky tax approach.

Side Benefits

There are side benefits to this sound approach too.

Many Self-Directed Solo 401(k) investors are doing active real estate deals inside their retirement plan. That introduces further limitations, especially with debt financing, such as:

• Lower LTV (loan-to-value ratio) loan limits
• Less lenders and loans available in the marketplace
• Higher down payment (more cash investment required, which lowers cash-on-cash return)

Don’t get me wrong. Many healthy, profitable real estate deals are done inside retirement plans and with debt financing.

But, not all real estate deals should be done either inside or outside of a retirement plan. It depends on the circumstances.

If it’s truly a passive investment, go for it inside your plan. If it’s truly an active deal, go for it outside of your plan. If you want to pay cash or make a large down payment, that sounds fitting for inside your plan. If you want to invest as little cash as possible, that sounds fitting for outside your plan.

So, I hope this helps you get your mental strategery in order.

Like many lessons in life, the real progress is made in unlearning myths, deceptions, and bad information. I mean, it isn’t exactly earth shattering to stand up and say “Business activity goes in a business, and investment activity goes in an investment plan,” is it? Yet, after thousands of hours in the Self-Directed Solo 401(k) industry, it may make a big impact.

——

Odds & Ends:

Don’t miss out on my year-end Solo 401k special promotion. Get on my email list to be notified when it kicks off.

]]> http://www.solo401k.com/2010/11/18/the-most-elusive-dangerous-self-directed-solo-401k-practice-part-2/feed/ 8 http://www.solo401k.com/2010/11/16/the-most-elusive-dangerous-self-directed-solo-401k-practice/ http://www.solo401k.com/2010/11/16/the-most-elusive-dangerous-self-directed-solo-401k-practice/#comments Tue, 16 Nov 2010 21:09:10 +0000 Jeff Nabers http://www.solo401k.com/?p=323 [Originally published at JeffNabers.com.]

There’s something that most “successful” Self-Directed Solo 401(k) investors do that can spin them out of control and get them into trouble.

I say “successful” in quotation marks because I’m talking about the particular kind of Self-Directed Solo 401(k) success that is sexy enough to be frequently written about.

What is this dirty deed that leads to massive profits and the potential implosion the very same Self-Directed Solo 401(k) that got those profits?

Entrepreneurship.

Bad Entrepreneur!

Yep. Entrepreneurship is so powerful that it seems to be the source of all aggressive wealth creation. So where’s the danger?

Let me explain. Some of the most [initially] profitable Self-Directed Solo 401(k) stories sounds something like this…

Joe, a Self-Directed Solo 401(k) investor, knows how to work real estate deals into profits. So he buys and sells real estate in his Self-Directed Solo 401(k). Sometimes he involves bank financing. Sometimes he involves private financing and partnering.

But one thing is for sure: Once Joe purchases a property, the work has just begun. He has a system. He only buys properties that meet a certain criteria. After the closing, he usually has repairs and/or remodeling work done.

And his system works. He’ll put $30k or $40k of his Self-Directed Solo 401(k) money into a deal and get $80k to $100k out, often less than a year or two later.

First, applaud Joe for being a successful entrepreneur.

Did you catch that? Joe is being an entrepreneur rather than an investor. This is because his deals have his active involvement rather than the passive placement of his money.

The Pinless Grenade

Unbeknownst to Joe, he’s no longer in control of his financial outcome. His choice to try to sneak business activity inside his Solo 401(k) gives the IRS an open invitation to tax the hell out of him.

How much?

Well, the IRS can declare Joe’s Solo 401(k) deals to be a “trade or business” in which they’ll apply the UBTI tax. Also known as the most aggressive tax schedule in the United States. It ramps up to 35% federal tax after only $10,000 of profit.

Will the IRS make this move? When?

That’s unknown, and Joe is no longer in control of his financial outcome.

Terrible Success

All kinds of strategies fit into this same category. I have a friend who has done over 100 deals inside his Self-Directed Solo 401(k), producing a return-on-investment of over 9,000%.

And he’s hiding under a rock. He won’t returns the calls of the newspaper and magazine reporters who want him to share his strategies with the world. He rarely teaches investing seminars, and when he does he only invites people who he has personally met and known for at least 6 months. He essentially lives a life of fear because he knows the day his Self-Directed Solo 401(k) gets audited may be the day he gives up at least $1,200,000 plus late penalties and interest to the IRS.

Enjoyable, Controlled Success

Do you know how to do deals that turn pennies into thousands? Thousands into millions?

Fantastic.

Don’t ever consider not pursuing massive profits, and don’t ever lock away your talents and skills to be unused.

Just take a few minutes to educate yourself about the best way to structure your deals to keep you in control.

More info coming in Part Two of this post soon  :-)

Now you can download a small piece of software that turns your computer into a portal for setting up your new Solo 401(k) in minutes.

Faster Creation

You can literally bring your Solo 401(k) plan into existence the same day that you get the software. You don’t have to be full-time self employed to qualify either; self-employment activity on the side of full-time employment elsewhere still qualifies you for the Solo 401(k).

Easier Transactions & Maintenance

It also makes certain tasks easier beyond setting up and funding the plan with rollovers. For instance, if you ever need to draw on the participant loan feature that lets you borrow up to $50,000 tax-free from your retirement funds, you can just fire up the software and get the loan funds (up to $50,000) in your hands on the same day.

Making contributions has never been easier. Use the software to instantly calculate your maximum legal contribution (up to $54,00) each year. Double that if your spouse is involved in your self-employment activity because she (or he) can contribute up to the same limits as well.

Clearer Benefit

There’s even a value calculator that shows you how much your 401k plan is measurably benefiting you. Most people find it’s in the tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars per year.

Total Control

And, of course, enjoying the power of controlling the checkbook for your own 401k investments comes with unlimited, legally-allowable possibilities… such as investing in:

• Private businesses equity
• Non-dollar, safe offshore investments
• Private lending
• Real estate
• Tax liens
• Virtually anything else (just no “self-dealing” or conflict-of-interest transactions)

After thousands of private trials gone smoothly and plenty of early adoption switch-over from our existing loyal clients, we’ll be doing a big promotion to celebrate making this available for new clients.

If you’re on my email list, you’ll be the first to get access.
[You can can join it if you haven't already]

Thanks for all your support, and everyone here at Nabers Group is ecstatic about unveiling our latest way to give back to the community!

Solo 401(k) retirement plans can grant direct checkbook control without the use of an LLC or custodian.

The concept of custodian comes from Internal Revenue Code Section 408(a)(2) and is defined in Section 408(n). This entire IRC section 408 is devoted to Individual Retirement Accounts, or IRAs. The code basically explains that an IRA is normally a trust, and the trustee must be a bank. It then defines bank as a bank, trust company, or any company specifically approved by the IRS. This capacity of trustee to an IRA is known as “custodian”. This trustee role is simply that of investing the plan as directed by the accountholder.

A Solo 401(k) plan is a type of 401(k) that is designed for self employed individuals whose businesses have no full time employees. All 401(k) plans are qualified plans, and qualified plans do not have any special restrictions on who can serve as trustee.

So the significant difference is that with a Solo 401(k), the participant can actually be the trustee and handle the investment transactions themselves. This can serve to simplify operating the plan because no third party is introduced. Such simplification can also serve to minimize third party fees.

Titling of Assets

If you’ve been researching or operating a self directed IRA, you may be familiar with how IRA assets must be titled. If Jeremy Smith had an IRA with Sunwest Trust, his IRA’s assets would be titled as:

Sunwest Trust, Inc. F/B/O Jeremy Smith IRA

“F/B/O” means “for benefit of”. To experience the benefits of checkbook control, some self directed IRA accountholders choose to create a special purpose LLC to be owned by their IRA but managed by them. So the membership units of the LLC would be titled as:

Sunwest Trust, Inc. F/B/O Jeremy Smith IRA

…and Jeremy (as manager of that LLC) would further invest the new LLC funds to purchase assets that would be titled in the name of the LLC.

To own and directly control retirement assets in a Solo 401(k) plan can be much simpler. Jeremy would simply have his plan setup to name himself as trustee. He would then direct the plan to purchase assets to be titled to:

Jeremy Smith Solo 401k Trust

…or whatever Jeremy chooses to name the trust that exists for the sole purpose of managing the assets for his Solo 401(k) plan. In this case, there is absolutely no need to setup an LLC for the purpose of gaining checkbook control.

This convenience is little known because conventionally 401(k) plans have served as an investment vehicle for large corporations with many participants. Solo 401(k) plans are much easier and less expensive to operate. In fact, Jeremy can serve the roles of employer, employee, plan participant, plan administrator, and plan trustee. Serving the role of employer and employee allows him to contribute up to $46,000 per year to his account (or $51,000 if he’s over age 50). If Jeremy’s wife works in his business, she can participate as well and contribute up to another $46k each year.

The Downside of Checkbook Control

You may hear about potential problems of checkbook control, such as recordkeeping and legal compliance. Firstly, the only reporting required for a Solo 401(k) is annual filing of Form 5500-EZ, and it is only required once plan assets exceed $250,000 in value. There are plenty of companies who will prepare this form for about $300.

The issue of checkbook control legal compliance is quite simple. All self directed accountholders and participants must avoid prohibited transactions. This requirement and responsibility rests solely on you as accountholder/participant regardless of whether you have checkbook control and regardless of whether you are using and IRA or Solo 401(k). See an elaborate explanation here.

The facts are that when using a self directed, self administered, self trusteed Solo 401(k):

• meeting the reporting requirements is simple, and it’s inexpensive to have Form 5500-EZ prepared for you
• there is no special or unique risk of legal noncompliance that would otherwise be eliminated by using a custodian

Conclusion

In my opinion, a Solo 401(k) where the same person serves all roles involved is the simplest, most effective and direct way for that person to self direct their retirement plan investments. It opens doors to the most flexible options possible. This allows for investment into foreign assets, investment clubs, tax liens, precious metals, and many other investments that some custodians optionally refuse.

So if you’re self employed (through your own Corporation, LLC, or even Sole Proprietorship) and you have no full time employees, the rules are bent in your favor with a Solo 401(k) – arranging and utilizing checkbook control is easier.

For the self employed, a fantastic development has occurred over the past few years – the Solo 401(k). One distinct advantage of the Solo 401(k) over an IRA is that it is not subject to paying UBIT on profits from financed real estate. Eliminating UBIT by using a Solo 401(k) eliminates the need to file a return (Form 990-T) as well as the accompanying tax. Sound pretty good so far?

The difficulty in recent times has been obtaining nonrecourse financing. The leader of NR financing in the Self Directed IRA industry for the past few years has been North American Savings Bank. Last year, they took the familiarity of IRA lending and applied it to Solo 401(k). Unfortunately for many Solo(k) investors, this has only been available to plans who choose to name a custodian as trustee of the plan. Qualified plans (which is what all 401k plans are) are different than IRAs in that they are not required by law to name a custodian (bank or trust company) as trustee of the plan assets. Investors who establish Self Directed Solo 401(k) plans that name themselves as trustee for simplicity have not been able to readily obtain mortgage loans for their Solo (k) plan from NASB.

Well, as of this month, NASB has expanded their loan products to include a nonrecourse loan program for self trusteed Solo 401(k) plans. I caught up with Matt Allen to discuss the great news on UNLIMITED RETIREMENT ACCOUNT® Radio. The skinny is that the program is almost identical to the IRA lending program. If you aren’t familiar with their guidelines, check out the URA Radio show podcast as it become available soon.

Subscribe :: del.icio.us :: Digg this :: Stumble it :: facebook

:: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: [What are these icons for?]

We have seen some unbelievable things over the past few years… especially the past few months. The only thing certain is that there is a lot of uncertainty ahead. If you haven’t already done so, right now I strongly suggest you watch the 30 minute condensed version of the film I.O.U.S.A. This film features David Walker, the former U.S. Comptroller General… aka the chief accountant of the government. He tried to fix the government’s financial problems, but Dick Cheney and others told him he needed to stop because they didn’t need solving. So he stepped down from his position and decided to prove to the world just how bad of shape our government really is in.

Today some people, including congressmen, are promoting some very extreme ideas. Some of these ideas involve the government “nationalizing” (or “confiscating” for those of us who speak directly) the assets of the people. Some plans even call for confiscation of retirement account assets specifically. In one scheme called the “Guaranteed Retirement Account” all retirement assets would be liquidated and handed over the Social Security Administration for investment management in a program that would provide a guaranteed return of 3% per year. This kind of silliness doesn’t need to be gratified by anything more than a brief response:

1. We’ve already seen how well the Social Security Administration manages money. It simply doesn’t. There is no money. There is no account. It just hands its income straight over to the general spending account of the government, and (not surprisingly) it gets spent!
2. Liquidating $16 trillion is impossible. It would crash the securities market entirely, and $16 trillion would not be withdrawn. If you started liquidating people’s retirement accounts alphabetically by name, those with names that start with letters n through z would receive little to nothing because of the price free fall created by the first half of the mass sell off.
3. The real world cost of living increases do not jive with published CPI figures, and there is often a discrepancy of much more than a few percent. A 3% return on investment would likely be a steady loss of principal when accurately indexing for inflation.

While we may not see that particular scheme enacted into law, it can’t be ignored that this type of solution is being considered. This government theft approach isn’t unheard of. In fact, Argentina just did it! Don’t forget that our government “confiscated” personal gold holdings in 1933… at least sort of. It was really more of a “government request” than a confiscation. An executive order was announced that requested that citizens show up to a Federal Reserve Branch within a month to sell their gold for $20 per ounce. The notable fact here is that not all the gold was turned in. According to author John Rubino, only 22% of the gold in circulation was actually turned in. Shortly thereafter, the gold price was set to $35 per ounce, thus devaluing the dollar by 41%.

It is not beyond possibility for our government to aim to take our wealth to pay for its financial problems. The difference between the gold confiscation of the 1930s and the threat of retirement account confiscation today is this: In the 1930s it was effectively voluntary to surrender your gold, while today over 99.9% of retirement assets are in the hands of custodians who are regulated by the federal government. While the 1933 confiscation was only 22% effective, a confiscation today would be 99.9% effective because of our unfounded trust in the financial services industry.

If a wealth “nationalization” plan were pursued, the outlook is grim for the overall population, but you can protect your wealth by simply taking direct possession of it. With an IRA LLC or a self-directed, self-trustee Solo 401k plan, you can legally hold your retirement account assets yourself directly. If an order were placed for you to surrender your retirement account assets, you could simply distribute them to yourself before the order deadline. In such a case you might have to give up 40% or more of your assets to taxation, but that is much better than losing 100%.

Again, I don’t like to come off as spreading “gloom and doom”, but unbelievable economic events are occurring left and right. The acts of the Fed (in concert with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac) may have already devastated your first pillar of wealth – home equity. Don’t let further acts of foolishness destroy your retirement account.

Spend your time looking at the lighter side of things – investments that perform well; investments that you can understand and have predictable results. Just make sure that you are protected from losing your assets due to lack of optimal structuring. Whether you use a Self Directed IRA or Solo 401k to invest in a variety of alternative assets, make sure you set yourself up for direct possession of your assets.

Subscribe :: del.icio.us :: Digg this :: Stumble it :: facebook

:: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: [What are these icons for?]