<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unrelated Business Income Tax &#8211; UBIT for Solo 401(k) &amp; IRA accounts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.solo401k.com/2009/02/19/unrelated-business-income-tax-ubit-for-solo-401k-ira-accounts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.solo401k.com/2009/02/19/unrelated-business-income-tax-ubit-for-solo-401k-ira-accounts/</link>
	<description>The Ultra-Powerful Investment &#38; Retirement Plan for the Self-Employed</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 23:41:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Nabers</title>
		<link>http://www.solo401k.com/2009/02/19/unrelated-business-income-tax-ubit-for-solo-401k-ira-accounts/comment-page-1/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Nabers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 14:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solo401k.com/?p=123#comment-69</guid>
		<description>Actually seller financing does undo the UBIT exemption for qualified plans (including the Solo 401k), but it was recently brought to my attention that that lack of exemption doesn&#039;t apply to seller financing with &quot;reasonable terms&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually seller financing does undo the UBIT exemption for qualified plans (including the Solo 401k), but it was recently brought to my attention that that lack of exemption doesn&#8217;t apply to seller financing with &#8220;reasonable terms&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thom</title>
		<link>http://www.solo401k.com/2009/02/19/unrelated-business-income-tax-ubit-for-solo-401k-ira-accounts/comment-page-1/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>Thom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 19:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solo401k.com/?p=123#comment-68</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the above clarification! I noticed it said,&quot;type 2 ubit GENERALLY does not apply&quot;-and I was left &quot;scratching&quot; my head again. Just to be sure...if in the solo k you obtain SELLER financing for real estate as opposed to a bank loan.....would this change UBIT either??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the above clarification! I noticed it said,&#8221;type 2 ubit GENERALLY does not apply&#8221;-and I was left &#8220;scratching&#8221; my head again. Just to be sure&#8230;if in the solo k you obtain SELLER financing for real estate as opposed to a bank loan&#8230;..would this change UBIT either??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Nabers</title>
		<link>http://www.solo401k.com/2009/02/19/unrelated-business-income-tax-ubit-for-solo-401k-ira-accounts/comment-page-1/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Nabers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 22:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solo401k.com/?p=123#comment-67</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s pleasing to see investors pursue a thorough self education. I hope that over time more investors will follow your lead.  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s pleasing to see investors pursue a thorough self education. I hope that over time more investors will follow your lead.  <img src='http://www.solo401k.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.solo401k.com/2009/02/19/unrelated-business-income-tax-ubit-for-solo-401k-ira-accounts/comment-page-1/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 22:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solo401k.com/?p=123#comment-66</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m just a knowledgeable investor, not an attorney.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just a knowledgeable investor, not an attorney.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Nabers</title>
		<link>http://www.solo401k.com/2009/02/19/unrelated-business-income-tax-ubit-for-solo-401k-ira-accounts/comment-page-1/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Nabers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solo401k.com/?p=123#comment-65</guid>
		<description>Bob,

Thanks for the input. There are too many possibilities of investment transactions and assets to cover in a single blog post. So this post focuses on real estate.

Also, in an effort to break things down to simple terms that are easy to understand, I use the term &quot;LTV&quot; in the sense that mortgage companies consider the purchase price of the property to be the &quot;V&quot; rather than the actual value.

For non-recourse mortgage loans provided by a bank, the scenario of having a loan of 100% of the purchase price is not realistic as 65% - 70% is typically the maximum.

Thanks for your attention to detail. If I ever write a post about borrowing money to invest in assets other than real property, I&#039;ll be sure to acknowledge that the UDFI exemption for qualified plans doesn&#039;t apply.

Are you an attorney? CPA? Do you practice in this field?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob,</p>
<p>Thanks for the input. There are too many possibilities of investment transactions and assets to cover in a single blog post. So this post focuses on real estate.</p>
<p>Also, in an effort to break things down to simple terms that are easy to understand, I use the term &#8220;LTV&#8221; in the sense that mortgage companies consider the purchase price of the property to be the &#8220;V&#8221; rather than the actual value.</p>
<p>For non-recourse mortgage loans provided by a bank, the scenario of having a loan of 100% of the purchase price is not realistic as 65% &#8211; 70% is typically the maximum.</p>
<p>Thanks for your attention to detail. If I ever write a post about borrowing money to invest in assets other than real property, I&#8217;ll be sure to acknowledge that the UDFI exemption for qualified plans doesn&#8217;t apply.</p>
<p>Are you an attorney? CPA? Do you practice in this field?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.solo401k.com/2009/02/19/unrelated-business-income-tax-ubit-for-solo-401k-ira-accounts/comment-page-1/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solo401k.com/?p=123#comment-64</guid>
		<description>While 401k accounts are exempt from UDFI on leveraged real estate, they are not per se exempt from UDFI. For example, borrowing money to purchase a mortgage or lend money, which would otherwise produce kosher income, generates UDFI. You have to form a REIT to avoid income tax on such borrowings.

Also, depending on what you mean by &quot;loan to value&quot;, UDFI could be paid on a lot more than 65% of a property&#039;s net income. If you buy cheap enough, 65% LTV could be 100% of purchase price, which means 100% of net income is taxable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While 401k accounts are exempt from UDFI on leveraged real estate, they are not per se exempt from UDFI. For example, borrowing money to purchase a mortgage or lend money, which would otherwise produce kosher income, generates UDFI. You have to form a REIT to avoid income tax on such borrowings.</p>
<p>Also, depending on what you mean by &#8220;loan to value&#8221;, UDFI could be paid on a lot more than 65% of a property&#8217;s net income. If you buy cheap enough, 65% LTV could be 100% of purchase price, which means 100% of net income is taxable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
